Download Report

Download our 2024 study

We are committed to helping you produce high-quality and highly-accurate environmental data globally.

Download study by filling your email below


Frequently asked questions

The amount of DNA present in the environment can vary widely depending on factors such as the type of habitat, the diversity of species present, and environmental conditions (i.e. season). In aquatic environments, such as rivers, lakes, and oceans, there can be substantial amounts of DNA due to the shedding of cells and genetic material from aquatic organisms. Terrestrial environments, like soil and sediment, also contain DNA from a variety of sources, including plants, animals, and microorganisms.

DNA concentration can range from very low levels to more substantial quantities, making it important to use sensitive techniques, like environmental DNA (eDNA), to detect and identify species in different ecosystems.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis can offer great advantages in terms of sensitivity and accuracy. Its accuracy compared to traditional methods varies depending on the specific context and objectives. 

Here’s a general comparison:

Sensitivity: eDNA analysis is often more sensitive than traditional methods. It can detect the presence of target species at very low concentrations, making it suitable for detecting rare or elusive species that may go unnoticed with traditional survey methods.

Non-invasiveness: eDNA is non-invasive, meaning it doesn’t require physically capturing or disturbing organisms. This can be especially valuable when analyzing sensitive or endangered species without causing harm.

Cost-effectiveness: eDNA analysis can be more cost-effective for broad-scale surveys and monitoring, as it reduces the need for extensive fieldwork, traps, or physical specimen collection.

Speed: eDNA analysis can provide results relatively quickly, especially when compared to traditional methods that involve time-consuming and labor-intensive surveys which have to be done at the right time of the year.

The accuracy of environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis depends on several factors, including the quality of the sampling, the sensitivity of the molecular techniques used, and the expertise of the researchers. When performed correctly, eDNA analysis can be highly accurate and provide reliable information about the presence or absence of target species in an environment.

Key factors that influence the accuracy of eDNA analysis include:

Sampling methods: Proper sampling is crucial to minimize contamination and false positives. Researchers must collect samples carefully to avoid cross-contamination and ensure that the samples accurately represent the environment in question.

Laboratory techniques: Sensitivity and specificity of the molecular techniques employed, such as PCR (polymerase chain reaction) or next-generation sequencing, can impact accuracy. Highly sensitive techniques can detect very low concentrations of eDNA, while specific primers are needed to target the desired species accurately.

Reference databases: The accuracy of eDNA analysis relies on the quality and comprehensiveness of the reference databases used for species identification. The availability of well-curated genetic reference data is essential.

Data analysis: Accurate data analysis and the use of appropriate statistical methods are critical to differentiate true positive signals from noise.

Environmental factors: Environmental conditions, such as water flow, sediment composition, and the presence of inhibitors, can affect the detectability of eDNA.

SpringDNA considers all these factors when interpreting results and analyzing projects. Overall, when conducted with care and using state-of-the-art techniques, eDNA analysis can be a highly accurate and sensitive tool for detecting the presence of target species in the environment – especially compared to traditional methods

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is a game-changing tool in biodiversity surveys and monitoring, especially due to its cost-effectiveness. When compared to traditional field survey methods, eDNA often offers cost savings and efficiency gains. The key to eDNA’s cost efficiency lies in its ability to streamline data collection. Traditional field surveys can be labor-intensive and require significant expenditures on equipment, travel, and personnel. In contrast, eDNA sampling reduces the need for extensive fieldwork and the associated costs. By collecting environmental samples like water, soil, or sediment, SpringDNA can uncover genetic information about the organisms present in the ecosystem. Laboratory processing of eDNA samples, while incurring costs, can be more efficient than the manual labor required for traditional methods like trapping, visual surveys, or specimen collection.

Additionally, eDNA analysis can be easily scaled up for large-scale surveys and monitoring, providing even more substantial cost savings. Furthermore, eDNA analysis can be highly sensitive, enabling the detection of rare, elusive, or invasive species that might otherwise go unnoticed using traditional methods. This detection capability can result in more efficient resource allocation and management strategies, preventing the spread of invasive species or helping protect threatened or endangered ones. In summary, the cost-effectiveness of eDNA analysis stems from reduced fieldwork, streamlined data collection, and the ability to detect species with high sensitivity. In addition, eDNA methods save time as some species can be detected all year round.

Learn more about our services